Rural areas of Ottawa County have been targeted for renewable energy projects. Zeeland and Jamestown Townships have a developer wanting to put solar panels on 1900 acres. In Blendon Township, a developer is vying for close to fifteen acres for a battery energy storage system (BESS).
But what if you don’t live in the country? Or maybe you live in the country but haven’t thought you’re close enough to give this any thought. This debate affects you more than you might think.
If you live within a five-mile radius of the proposed Bess site in Blendon Township, an evacuation could be in your future were one of the lithium batteries to catch on fire. It has happened other BESS across the. country. In 2024, the facility in Escondido, CA, caught fire and residents, businesses, and schools were evacuated for two days. When the evacuation orders were lifted after the Moss Landing BESS fire, residents were allowed to return to their homes were told to “stay indoors in case the fire pollutes the air with toxic gases.”
Would you have a place to go for an undetermined amount of time? Could you bring your pets? Anything left behind, would have the potential to soak in the toxins—pets, vegetables growing in your garden, the air entering your home. Could your household chores and routine be left for days at a time? Could local businesses afford to shut down for a period? And what about area manufacturing sites? Would they be able to halt production and evacuate? How would schools and GVSU evacuate? What about hospitals, nursing homes, and the home bound evacuate? What will hang in the air and seep into your home while you’re gone?
Are you a fan of Farm to Table? Have you become more interested in knowing where your food comes from and the farmers who bring it to you? If 1900 acres of Ottawa County are no longer deemed agricultural, what might that remove from the local food chain?
• Cows: At a requirement of 1 to 2 acres per cow, the land could have held over 900 cows. At roughly 400 pounds of meat per steer, that’s a minimum of 360,000 pounds of beef. As for dairy cows, each cow averages a minimum of 2000 gallons of milk per year. A field of 900 dairy cows could produce 1,800,000 gallons of milk each year.
• Pigs: At a minimum of fifteen finisher (meat) pigs per acre, 1900 acres could have held 28,600 pigs. With the average pig providing 140 pounds of meat, that would be 4,004,000 pounds of meat.
• Hay: An average of 100 bales could be gathered per acre. 1900 acres could have yielded 190,000 bales of hay.
• Blueberries: An average of 5000 pounds of blueberries could be produced per acre. 1900 acres could have yielded 9,500,000 pounds of blueberries.
• Corn: 168 bushels of corn could be harvested per acre. 1900 acres could have produced 319,200 bushels or 17,556,000 pounds of corn.
• Soybeans: 46 bushels of soybeans could be grown per acre times. 1900 acres could have produced 87,400 bushels or 5,244,000 pounds of soybeans.
Not only would those contributions not be put into the food chain for the life of the project, but with the potential for heavy metal particles from the batteries and solar panels leaching into the ground, that land might never contribute to the food chain again.
What costs more? Shipping our food supply into Ottawa County or having energy sources that aren’t local?
And if the land weren’t used for food, what about the other need our county has right now: housing. Covering 1900 with solar panels keeps that land from becoming residential.
The dent 1900 acres could put in the housing shortage:
Given the land is agricultural with larger lot sizes, at a conservative estimate one home per five acres, 1900 acres could at least 380 homes. The push seems to be for tiny housing, multi-unit housing, etc. Would that push need to be there if the land weren’t being monopolized by these projects? Do you plan to live in your current residence forever? If not, will your home be difficult ro sell due to its vicinity to the project?
Even if you support the idea of having renewable projects constructed in your hometown, are you comfortable with the manner in which the State has been handling the influx?
Up until about a year and a half ago, municipalities followed the guidelines provided by Public Act 233 for renewable energy projects. Townships had the power to set restrictions on noise, setbacks, zoning, etc., just as they would for other industries, companies, or individuals, looking to build within their borders.
But on October 4th, 2024, the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) released an Order. Within the Order were a new application process, new definitions, and an altered structure of power under PA 233. Essentially, the MPSC—an unelected body of three commissioners appointed by Governor Gretchen Whitmer—determined who would have the authority to approve applications of renewable energy developers. If local a Planning Commission followed the Order and wrote a compatible ordinance, a developer could site locally. If a Planning Commission failed to write a compatible ordinance, a developer could bypass the municipality and apply directly to the MPSC.
Why is this a big deal?
The Order made it so that townships can no longer control where these companies choose to place their projects if a developer has found a landowner(s) willing to lease property. Meaning, land that is zoned agricultural is no longer off limits, and if an application is accepted, renewable energy projects could be put beside livestock, crops, and residential homes, leading to risks of land, air, groundwater contamination and causing residents greater concern than if these risks were contained to industrial zones.
Lawsuit against the MPSC
In response to the Order, 72 municipalities are fighting to regain local control using the legal system. On April 15, 2026, oral arguments were heard by the Michigan Court of Appeals. Representing the 72 municipalities was Attorney Michael Homier of Foster Swift. Homier posed the argument that the MPSC had legislated requirements in the PA 233 Statute that had not been there, and that this isn’t the first time this court has needed to reign in an agency.
Judge Christopher M. Murray agreed that if the MPSC has taken away zoning authority, then local units of government are deprived of a plan to site, public hearing, and all the things the Legislature said should happen to get local input. Appearing to counter that view was Chief Judge Michael F. Gadola, who ventured that prior to the Order, townships had the ability to make parameters so restrictive that an energy company couldn’t possibly locate a facility within their community.
Homier didn’t agree. He said that the Zoning Enabling Act had provided guardrails by stipulating that townships cannot pass, adopt, or enforce an ordinance that prohibits a land use when there’s a demonstrated need. Homier added that to his knowledge “there hasn’t been a single case involving renewable energies where any of his clients or any of the affected local units had ever been held responsible for exclusionary zoning on that basis.” Meaning, he reiterated, the guardrails were working.
The MPSC, Homier argued, went way beyond promulgating an order for application filing instructions and procedures. Rather than determining matters such as how many copies are required, what the fee will be, etc., the MPSC fundamentally changed “the definition and the relationship” of the municipalities in this “permitting scheme.”
In a counter argument, Nicholas Taylor, the assistant attorney general representing the MPSC, claimed that the Order speaks to the legislative intent of PA 233, and that the interpretation was necessary in order for PA 233 to be used and work in the way that the Legislature intended. But the problem, Judge Murray responded, is that the Legislature didn’t say that. “It comes to the separation of powers and who really makes the rules… And if there’s a problem with a Statute, and it’s not able to be practically enforced, don’t you go back to the Legislature and have them amend it?”
Judge Gadola asked Taylor if in his judgement the MPSC is stating that a solar farm could go, for example, in a residential neighborhood, and windmills could be erected next to an elementary school. Taylor replied that as long as a project meets PA 233 approval requirements under Section 2267, there would be nothing that would bind the MPSC to additional restrictions at the local level.
Brion Doyle, the attorney representing the intervening appellees, repeatedly spoke of the intent of the Order being to remedy the “mischief” of the townships. He claimed that if zoning was left to the townships, the State would not meet the clean energy standards and the renewable energy goals.
Contrary to what Homier claimed, Doyle stated that the “guardrails” prior to the Order were only working for the municipalities and were preventing any renewable developments. Chief Judge Gadola appeared to agree, telling Doyle: “I think you’re on pretty firm ground with respect to that particular mischief making, if you want to put it that way.”
In his rebuttal, Homier denied Doyle’s accusations of townships vetoing projects and said that, to his knowledge, he knew of no instance of that. He told the judges that “the only mischief here is by the MPSC rewriting legislative text… The Legislature understood full well what it was doing, and it didn't want to cram these facilities down rural Michigan's throat...” Homier concluded by asking the Court to overturn or vacate the Order.
And now we wait for a decision. Will the judges rule that townships are up to “mischief” for wanting to put restrictions around where a project is constructed in order to minimize the impact of potential harm to the community? Or will it be ruled that the MPSC acted with mischief when it took zoning authority away from local governments?
Other Efforts to Hold onto Local Control
While the 72 municipalities wait for the next step, other townships are using alternate routes to resist the loss of local control.
Zeeland Township: In response to the application by RWE for a 1900-acre solar farm that would stretch across Zeeland and Jamestown Townships, the Planning Commission developed an incompatible workable ordinance. The result was that RWE now is pursuing approval from the MPSC. Additionally, on March 3, 2026, the Planning Commission approved a one-year moratorium on data center applications while they work to develop a renewable energy ordinance.
Blendon Township: KCE filed an application for a BESS on August 28, 2025. Since then, the Planning Commission has been going through a deliberative process gathering facts and compiling conditions. Chair Mark Leathead intends to invite various experts to upcoming meetings in order to dissect each element of the application. Whether the township will develop an ordinance compatible or incompatible with what KCE is requesting, seems to be a decision that is months out.
Allendale Township: On March 23, 2025, the Board of Review passed a Resolution expressing opposition to House Bills 5529 through 5531 and 5581 through 5584 of 2026. The Board found that the Bills would place significant limitation on local zoning authority and local decision making as provided under the Michigan Zoning Enabling Act. In the Resolution, the Board urges members of the Michigan Legislature “to preserve the long-standing principle of local control over land use planning and zoning decisions as contemplated by the Michigan Zoning Enabling Act.”
There are other places to put renewable energy projects that won’t take up our farmland. In addition to industrial zoned areas, some companies have put their products on roof tops such as shopping centers, above parking lots, and over highways. These options are sites that already have covered the ground with concrete and wouldn’t take from our food chain or housing market. Brownfields, where the land already is contaminated, are another option.
All Residents Are Affected
So, whether you have a farm next door to the proposed project or you live across town where it’s out of sight and somewhat out of mind, by living in Ottawa County you are affected by the State moving in on local decisions.
The debate is not whether or not these companies should exist. Rather it’s that planning commissions are in place to help us live and work together effectively, to be mindful of our townships’ character and growth while looking out for our welfare. Should the State be able to take away decision-making authority of the board, which is seated by members of the community and subject to community input?
Krista Yetzke is a native of Ottawa County. A jeep-driving, guitar-playing wife, mom, and everyday adventurer, Krista was raised on the love of Jesus, the great outdoors, the arts, the value of frugality, and the beauty of food as medicine.
Copyright © 2025 Hollander Media. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without written authorization. By providing your email or phone number, you are consenting to receive emails, calls, and SMS/MMS messages from The Hollander and affiliates. Msg & data rates may apply.
